New England Society for Vascular Surgery
June 22, 2006

Major Lower Extremity Amputation After Multiple Revascularizations: Was It Worth It?

Back to Annual Meeting
Back to Program
Amy B Reed*, Cindy Delvecchio*, Joseph S Giglia*
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Introduction and Objectives:
Lower extremity revascularization is often described as excessively lesion-centric with insufficient focus on the patient. We investigated patients’ perspective of multiple procedures for limb salvage that culminated in major lower extremity amputation.
Methods:
A prospective vascular surgery database was queried from January 2000 to December 2005 for patients who had undergone below knee (BKA) or above knee (AKA) amputation after failed lower extremity revascularization. Patients were surveyed via telephone by a vascular nurse regarding thoughts on undergoing multiple procedures for limb salvage, involvement in decision-making, functional status (work, meal preparation, shopping, driving), use of prosthesis and independence. The Social Security Death Index (SSDI) was utilized to verify patient survival. Amputations for infection were excluded.
Results:
Seventy-eight patients underwent AKA or BKA after failed revascularization from January 2000 to December 2005. A total of 142 lower extremity revascularizations (median= 4/patient) were performed on these patients including 94 surgical bypass (median=3/patient) and 48 percutaneous interventions (median=1/patient).Forty-six patients (59%) were alive at 5 years. Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 33 available for survey. Eighty-five percent (28 of 33 patients) of amputees surveyed would do everything to save the leg if faced with a similar scenario, regardless of the number of procedures. Fifty-four percent (18/33) of patients actively used a prosthesis and 91% (30/33) resided at home.
Conclusions:
In retrospect, patients are willing to undergo multiple revascularizations - percutaneous or open -to attempt limb salvage even if the eventual result is major amputation. Independence and functional status appear to be obtainable in a majority of patients. Patient-oriented outcomes are necessary to guide revascularization, whether it is by percutaneous or open technique.

Patient Outcomes
Questions Yes No
Did you feel actively involved in decision regarding treatment to save your leg? 25 7
(1 undecided)
Did you feel actively involved in decision regarding amputation? 23 9
(1 undecided)
Did you feel you understood the extent of your condition/disease? 26 7
Did you feel you understood the procedure/surgery you received in an attempt to save your leg? 23 9
(1 undecided)
Looking back on all you went through to save your leg, would you do it again if faced with the same scenario? 28 4
(1 undecided)
Did you go home after discharge? 15 18
Do you live at home now? 29 4
Do you use a prosthesis? 17 16
Before amputation, did you:
Work at a job?
Prepare your own meals?
Drive?
Do your own shopping?
14
29
28 27
19
4
5
6
After amputation, did you:
Work at a job?
Prepare your own meals?
Drive?
Do your own shopping?
0
20
18
13
33
13
15
20


Back to Annual Meeting
Back to Program
© 2009 Copyright New England Society for Vascular Surgery